Why propositions might be sets of truth-supporting circumstances
Soames (Philos Top 15:44–87, 1987, J Philos Logic 37:267–276, 2008) has argued that propositions cannot be sets of truth-supporting circumstances. This argument is criticized for assuming that various singular terms are directly referential when in fact there are good grounds to doubt this.
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Journal article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydáno: |
Springer
2009
|
| Shrnutí: | Soames (Philos Top 15:44–87, 1987, J Philos Logic 37:267–276, 2008) has argued that propositions cannot be sets of truth-supporting circumstances. This argument is criticized for assuming that various singular terms are directly referential when in fact there are good grounds to doubt this. |
|---|