Why propositions might be sets of truth-supporting circumstances
Soames (Philos Top 15:44–87, 1987, J Philos Logic 37:267–276, 2008) has argued that propositions cannot be sets of truth-supporting circumstances. This argument is criticized for assuming that various singular terms are directly referential when in fact there are good grounds to doubt this.
Main Author: | Elbourne, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2009
|
Similar Items
-
Why might God create?
by: Mawson, TJ
Published: (2022) -
Senescence: why and where selection gradients might not decline with age
by: Roper, M, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Unacceptable circumstances in takeovers
by: Ambaras Khan, Mushera Bibi
Published: (2010) -
What are minimum taxes and why might one favor or disfavor them?
by: Shaviro, D
Published: (2020) -
Propositionalism
by: Paseau, A
Published: (2021)