Why propositions might be sets of truth-supporting circumstances
Soames (Philos Top 15:44–87, 1987, J Philos Logic 37:267–276, 2008) has argued that propositions cannot be sets of truth-supporting circumstances. This argument is criticized for assuming that various singular terms are directly referential when in fact there are good grounds to doubt this.
1. Verfasser: | Elbourne, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer
2009
|
Ähnliche Einträge
Ähnliche Einträge
-
Why might God create?
von: Mawson, TJ
Veröffentlicht: (2022) -
Senescence: why and where selection gradients might not decline with age
von: Roper, M, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2021) -
Unacceptable circumstances in takeovers
von: Ambaras Khan, Mushera Bibi
Veröffentlicht: (2010) -
What are minimum taxes and why might one favor or disfavor them?
von: Shaviro, D
Veröffentlicht: (2020) -
Propositionalism
von: Paseau, A
Veröffentlicht: (2021)