To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
The peer review model is one of the most important tools used in science to assess the relative merit of research. We manipulated a published article to reflect one of the following four author designations: female, male, initial, and no name provided. This article was then reviewed by referees of b...
Main Authors: | Borsuk, R, Aarssen, L, Budden, A, Koricheva, J, Leimu, R, Tregenza, T, Lortie, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Similar Items
-
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Does double-blind review favor female authors? Reply
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008) -
The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology
by: Borsuk, R, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Does it pay to have a "bigwig" as a co-author?
by: Leimu, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Response to Whittaker: challenges in testing for gender bias
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008)