Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border

Background: Community engagement is increasingly promoted as a marker of good, ethical practice in the context of international collaborative research in low-income countries. There is, however, no widely agreed definition of community engagement or of approaches adopted. Justifications given for it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maung Lwin, K, Cheah, P, White, N, Day, N, Nosten, F, Parker, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2014
_version_ 1797100817650548736
author Maung Lwin, K
Cheah, P
Cheah, P
White, N
Day, N
Nosten, F
Parker, M
author_facet Maung Lwin, K
Cheah, P
Cheah, P
White, N
Day, N
Nosten, F
Parker, M
author_sort Maung Lwin, K
collection OXFORD
description Background: Community engagement is increasingly promoted as a marker of good, ethical practice in the context of international collaborative research in low-income countries. There is, however, no widely agreed definition of community engagement or of approaches adopted. Justifications given for its use also vary. Community engagement is, for example, variously seen to be of value in: the development of more effective and appropriate consent processes; improved understanding of the aims and forms of research; higher recruitment rates; the identification of important ethical issues; the building of better relationships between the community and researchers; the obtaining of community permission to approach potential research participants; and, the provision of better health care. Despite these diverse and potentially competing claims made for the importance of community engagement, there is very little published evidence on effective models of engagement or their evaluation. Methods. In this paper, drawing upon interviews with the members of a Community Advisory Board on the Thai-Myanmar border, we describe and critically reflect upon an approach to community engagement which was developed in the context of international collaborative research in the border region. Results and conclusions. Drawing on our analysis, we identify a number of considerations relevant to the development of an approach to evaluating community engagement in this complex research setting. The paper also identifies a range of important ways in which the Community Advisory Board is in practice understood by its members (and perhaps by community members beyond this) to have morally significant roles and responsibilities beyond those usually associated with the successful and appropriate conduct of research. © 2014 Maung Lwin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:43:01Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e63cd286-eb85-4935-98ec-90a2be6c3889
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:43:01Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e63cd286-eb85-4935-98ec-90a2be6c38892022-03-27T10:29:43ZMotivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar borderJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e63cd286-eb85-4935-98ec-90a2be6c3889EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Maung Lwin, KCheah, PCheah, PWhite, NDay, NNosten, FParker, MBackground: Community engagement is increasingly promoted as a marker of good, ethical practice in the context of international collaborative research in low-income countries. There is, however, no widely agreed definition of community engagement or of approaches adopted. Justifications given for its use also vary. Community engagement is, for example, variously seen to be of value in: the development of more effective and appropriate consent processes; improved understanding of the aims and forms of research; higher recruitment rates; the identification of important ethical issues; the building of better relationships between the community and researchers; the obtaining of community permission to approach potential research participants; and, the provision of better health care. Despite these diverse and potentially competing claims made for the importance of community engagement, there is very little published evidence on effective models of engagement or their evaluation. Methods. In this paper, drawing upon interviews with the members of a Community Advisory Board on the Thai-Myanmar border, we describe and critically reflect upon an approach to community engagement which was developed in the context of international collaborative research in the border region. Results and conclusions. Drawing on our analysis, we identify a number of considerations relevant to the development of an approach to evaluating community engagement in this complex research setting. The paper also identifies a range of important ways in which the Community Advisory Board is in practice understood by its members (and perhaps by community members beyond this) to have morally significant roles and responsibilities beyond those usually associated with the successful and appropriate conduct of research. © 2014 Maung Lwin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Maung Lwin, K
Cheah, P
Cheah, P
White, N
Day, N
Nosten, F
Parker, M
Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title_full Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title_fullStr Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title_full_unstemmed Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title_short Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: The case of the Thai-Myanmar border
title_sort motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research the case of the thai myanmar border
work_keys_str_mv AT maunglwink motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT cheahp motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT cheahp motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT whiten motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT dayn motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT nostenf motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder
AT parkerm motivationsandperceptionsofcommunityadvisoryboardsintheethicsofmedicalresearchthecaseofthethaimyanmarborder