Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
Two experiments investigated the conditions under which majority and minority sources instigate systematic processing of their messages. Both experiments crossed source status (majority vs. minority) with message quality (strong vs. weak arguments). In each experiment, message elaboration was manipu...
Main Authors: | Martin, R, Hewstone, M, Martin, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2007
|
Similar Items
-
Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model
by: Martin, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Majority versus minority influence: The role of message processing in determining resistance to counter-persuasion
by: Martin, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status
by: Martin, R, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing
by: Martin, R, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Misinformation on Instagram: The Impact of Trusted Endorsements on Message Credibility
by: Paul Mena, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)