Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
<p style="text-align:justify;"> <b> Background:</b> To allow an accurate evaluation of abstracts of systematic reviews, the PRISMA Statement recommends that the limitations of the evidence (e.g., risk of bias, publication bias, inconsistency, imprecision) should be descr...
Main Authors: | Yavchitz, A, Ravaud, P, Hopewell, S, Baron, G, Boutron, I |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Similar Items
-
Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: Interrupted time series analysis
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
by: Lazarus, C, et al.
Published: (2016)