Comparison of capability and health-related quality of life instruments in capturing aspects of mental well-being in people with schizophrenia and depression

<p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp;There is increasing evidence that assessing outcomes in terms of capability provides information beyond that of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for outcome evaluation in mental health research and clinical practice.</p> <p>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helter, TM, Coast, J, Łaszewska, A, Stamm, T, Simon, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022
Description
Summary:<p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp;There is increasing evidence that assessing outcomes in terms of capability provides information beyond that of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for outcome evaluation in mental health research and clinical practice.</p> <p><strong>Aims:</strong>&nbsp;To assess similarities and differences in the measurement properties of the ICECAP-A capability measure and Oxford Capabilities Questionnaire for Mental Health (OxCAP-MH) in people with schizophrenia experiencing depression, and compare these measurement properties with those of (a) the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) and (b) mental health-specific (disease-specific) measures.</p> <p><strong>Method:</strong>&nbsp;Using data for 100 patients from the UK, measurement properties were compared using correlation analyses, Bland&ndash;Altman plots and exploratory factor analysis. Responsiveness was assessed by defining groups who worsened, improved or remained unchanged, based on whether there was a clinically meaningful change in the instrument scores between baseline and 9-month follow-up assessments.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;The two capability instruments had stronger convergent validity with each other (Spearman's rho = 0.677) than with the HRQoL (rho = 0.354&ndash;0.431) or the mental health-specific (rho = 0.481&ndash;0.718) instruments. The OxCAP-MH tended to have stronger correlations with mental health-specific instruments than the ICECAP-A, whereas the ICECAP-A had slightly stronger correlation with the EQ-VAS. Change scores on the capability instruments correlated weakly with change scores on the HRQoL scales (rho = 0.131&ndash;0.269), but moderately with those on mental health-specific instruments for the ICECAP-A (rho = 0.355&ndash;0.451) and moderately/strongly on the OxCAP-MH (rho = 0.437&ndash;0.557).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>&nbsp;Assessing outcomes in terms of capabilities for people with schizophrenia and depression provided more relevant, mental health-specific information than the EQ-5D-5L or the EQ-VAS. The ICECAP-A and the OxCAP-MH demonstrated similar psychometric properties, but the OxCAP-MH was more correlated with disease-specific instruments.</p>