Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews
Having suggested that so-called ‘rapid’ reviews have been misnamed and should instead be called ‘restricted reviews’, Members of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine now suggest ways in which such reviews should be restricted.
Main Authors: | Plüddemann, A, Aronson, J, Onakpoya, I, Heneghan, C, Mahtani, K |
---|---|
格式: | Journal article |
语言: | English |
出版: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
相似书籍
-
A word about evidence: ‘rapid reviews’ or ‘restricted reviews’?
由: Aronson, J, et al.
出版: (2018) -
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.
由: Heneghan, C, et al.
出版: (2017) -
Transvaginal mesh failure: lessons for regulation of implantable devices.
由: Heneghan, C, et al.
出版: (2017) -
Reduced salt intake for heart failure: A systematic review
由: Mahtani, K, et al.
出版: (2018) -
Naltrexone‐bupropion (Mysimba®) in management of obesity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of unpublished clinical study reports
由: Onakpoya, IJ, et al.
出版: (2020)