Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female...
Main Authors: | Budden, A, Tregenza, T, Aarssen, L, Koricheva, J, Leimu, R, Lortie, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2008
|
Similar Items
-
Does double-blind review favor female authors? Reply
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Response to Webb et al.: Double-blind review: accept with minor revisions
by: Budden, A, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Does it pay to have a "bigwig" as a co-author?
by: Leimu, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
by: Borsuk, R, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
by: Aarssen, L, et al.
Published: (2009)