A multicenter comparison of MOG-IgG cell-based assays

<p><strong>Objectives</strong> To compares 3 different myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–immunoglobulin G (IgG) cell-based assays (CBAs) from 3 international centers.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> Serum samples from 394 patients were as follows: acute di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waters, P, Komorowski, L, Woodhall, M, Lederer, S, Majed, M, Fryer, J, Mills, J, Flanagan, E, Irani, S, Kunchok, A, McKeon, A, Pittock, S
Format: Journal article
Published: American Academy of Neurology 2019
Description
Summary:<p><strong>Objectives</strong> To compares 3 different myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–immunoglobulin G (IgG) cell-based assays (CBAs) from 3 international centers.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> Serum samples from 394 patients were as follows: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (28), seronegative neuromyelitis optica (27), optic neuritis (21 single, 2 relapsing), and longitudinally extensive (10 single, 3 recurrent). The control samples were from patients with multiple sclerosis (244), hypergammaglobulinemia (42), and other (17). Seropositivity was determined by visual observation on a fluorescence microscope (Euroimmun fixed CBA, Oxford live cell CBA) or flow cytometry (Mayo live cell fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay).</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Of 25 samples positive by any methodology, 21 were concordant on all 3 assays, 2 were positive at Oxford and Euroimmun, and 2 were positive only at Oxford. Euroimmun, Mayo, and Oxford results were as follows: clinical specificity 98.1%, 99.6%, and 100%; positive predictive values (PPVs) 82.1%, 95.5%, and 100%; and negative predictive values 79.0%, 78.8%, and 79.8%. Of 5 false-positives, 1 was positive at both Euroimmun and Mayo and 4 were positive at Euroimmun alone.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Overall, a high degree of agreement was observed across 3 different MOG-IgG CBAs. Both live cell-based methodologies had superior PPVs to the fixed cell assays, indicating that positive results in these assays are more reliable indicators of MOG autoimmune spectrum disorders.</p>