Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans
It is well established that the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a significant role in motor learning in healthy humans. It is unclear, however, whether mechanisms of motor learning include M1 oscillatory activity. In this study, we aimed to test whether M1 oscillations, entrained by transcranial Alt...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal article |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| _version_ | 1826302405792235520 |
|---|---|
| author | Bologna, M Guerra, A Paparella, G Colella, D Borrelli, A Suppa, A Di Lazzaro, V Brown, P Berardelli, A |
| author_facet | Bologna, M Guerra, A Paparella, G Colella, D Borrelli, A Suppa, A Di Lazzaro, V Brown, P Berardelli, A |
| author_sort | Bologna, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | It is well established that the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a significant role in motor learning in healthy humans. It is unclear, however, whether mechanisms of motor learning include M1 oscillatory activity. In this study, we aimed to test whether M1 oscillations, entrained by transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) at motor resonant frequencies, have any effect on motor acquisition and retention during a rapid learning task, as assessed by kinematic analysis. We also tested whether the stimulation influenced the corticospinal excitability changes after motor learning. Sixteen healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants performed the motor learning task in three experimental conditions: sham-tACS (baseline), β-tACS and γ-tACS. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with single-pulse TMS before the motor learning task and 5, 15, and 30 min thereafter. Motor retention was tested 30 min after the motor learning task. During training, acceleration of the practiced movement improved in the baseline condition and the enhanced performance was retained when tested 30 min later. The β-tACS delivered during training inhibited the acquisition of the motor learning task. Conversely, the γ-tACS slightly improved the acceleration of the practiced movement during training but it reduced motor retention. At the end of training, corticospinal excitability had similarly increased in the three sessions. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that entrainment of the two major motor resonant rhythms through tACS over M1 has different effects on motor learning in healthy humans. The effects, however, were unrelated to corticospinal excitability changes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:47:03Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e7914942-d652-4f35-856d-1d80497372ea |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:47:03Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e7914942-d652-4f35-856d-1d80497372ea2022-03-27T10:39:51ZTranscranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humansJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e7914942-d652-4f35-856d-1d80497372eaEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2019Bologna, MGuerra, APaparella, GColella, DBorrelli, ASuppa, ADi Lazzaro, VBrown, PBerardelli, AIt is well established that the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a significant role in motor learning in healthy humans. It is unclear, however, whether mechanisms of motor learning include M1 oscillatory activity. In this study, we aimed to test whether M1 oscillations, entrained by transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) at motor resonant frequencies, have any effect on motor acquisition and retention during a rapid learning task, as assessed by kinematic analysis. We also tested whether the stimulation influenced the corticospinal excitability changes after motor learning. Sixteen healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants performed the motor learning task in three experimental conditions: sham-tACS (baseline), β-tACS and γ-tACS. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with single-pulse TMS before the motor learning task and 5, 15, and 30 min thereafter. Motor retention was tested 30 min after the motor learning task. During training, acceleration of the practiced movement improved in the baseline condition and the enhanced performance was retained when tested 30 min later. The β-tACS delivered during training inhibited the acquisition of the motor learning task. Conversely, the γ-tACS slightly improved the acceleration of the practiced movement during training but it reduced motor retention. At the end of training, corticospinal excitability had similarly increased in the three sessions. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that entrainment of the two major motor resonant rhythms through tACS over M1 has different effects on motor learning in healthy humans. The effects, however, were unrelated to corticospinal excitability changes. |
| spellingShingle | Bologna, M Guerra, A Paparella, G Colella, D Borrelli, A Suppa, A Di Lazzaro, V Brown, P Berardelli, A Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title | Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title_full | Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title_fullStr | Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title_short | Transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency-dependent effects on motor learning in hHealthy humans |
| title_sort | transcranial alternating current stimulation has frequency dependent effects on motor learning in hhealthy humans |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bolognam transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT guerraa transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT paparellag transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT colellad transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT borrellia transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT suppaa transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT dilazzarov transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT brownp transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans AT berardellia transcranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasfrequencydependenteffectsonmotorlearninginhhealthyhumans |