Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis

<p><strong>Objective</p></strong> To assess the psychometric properties of a new questionnaire evaluating patients’ confidence in managing their tinnitus, the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire (4C), which was designed to be used in the process of cognitive behavioural the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aazh, H, Kartsonaki, C, Moore, BCJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis 2022
_version_ 1811139868294643712
author Aazh, H
Kartsonaki, C
Moore, BCJ
author_facet Aazh, H
Kartsonaki, C
Moore, BCJ
author_sort Aazh, H
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objective</p></strong> To assess the psychometric properties of a new questionnaire evaluating patients’ confidence in managing their tinnitus, the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire (4C), which was designed to be used in the process of cognitive behavioural therapy. <p><strong>Design</p></strong> Retrospective cross-sectional based on patient records. <p><strong>Study samples</p></strong> 99 consecutive patients who sought help for tinnitus (with or without hyperacusis) from an audiology clinic in the UK. Pure tone average (PTA) hearing thresholds, Uncomfortable Loudness Levels (ULLs), and responses to the 4C questionnaire, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus (SAD-T) questionnaire were gathered from the records of patients held at the audiology department. <p><strong>Results</p></strong> Cronbach’s alpha for the 4C was 0.91, indicating high internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor solution. Discriminant validity was supported by weak correlations between 4C scores and PTA across ears and ULLmin (the across-frequency average ULL for the ear with lower average ULL). Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations between 4C scores and scores for the THI, HQ, and SAD-T. <p><strong>Conclusions</p></strong> The 4C is an internally consistent questionnaire with high convergent and discriminant validity, which can be used to assess patients’ confidence in managing their tinnitus.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:12:55Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:e7b1884b-b105-4b7f-a50e-0c13dababa1e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:12:55Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e7b1884b-b105-4b7f-a50e-0c13dababa1e2024-07-05T17:25:22ZPsychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e7b1884b-b105-4b7f-a50e-0c13dababa1eEnglishSymplectic ElementsTaylor and Francis2022Aazh, HKartsonaki, CMoore, BCJ<p><strong>Objective</p></strong> To assess the psychometric properties of a new questionnaire evaluating patients’ confidence in managing their tinnitus, the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire (4C), which was designed to be used in the process of cognitive behavioural therapy. <p><strong>Design</p></strong> Retrospective cross-sectional based on patient records. <p><strong>Study samples</p></strong> 99 consecutive patients who sought help for tinnitus (with or without hyperacusis) from an audiology clinic in the UK. Pure tone average (PTA) hearing thresholds, Uncomfortable Loudness Levels (ULLs), and responses to the 4C questionnaire, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus (SAD-T) questionnaire were gathered from the records of patients held at the audiology department. <p><strong>Results</p></strong> Cronbach’s alpha for the 4C was 0.91, indicating high internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor solution. Discriminant validity was supported by weak correlations between 4C scores and PTA across ears and ULLmin (the across-frequency average ULL for the ear with lower average ULL). Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations between 4C scores and scores for the THI, HQ, and SAD-T. <p><strong>Conclusions</p></strong> The 4C is an internally consistent questionnaire with high convergent and discriminant validity, which can be used to assess patients’ confidence in managing their tinnitus.
spellingShingle Aazh, H
Kartsonaki, C
Moore, BCJ
Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title_full Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title_short Psychometric evaluation of the 4C tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the 4c tinnitus management questionnaire for patients with tinnitus alone or tinnitus combined with hyperacusis
work_keys_str_mv AT aazhh psychometricevaluationofthe4ctinnitusmanagementquestionnaireforpatientswithtinnitusaloneortinnituscombinedwithhyperacusis
AT kartsonakic psychometricevaluationofthe4ctinnitusmanagementquestionnaireforpatientswithtinnitusaloneortinnituscombinedwithhyperacusis
AT moorebcj psychometricevaluationofthe4ctinnitusmanagementquestionnaireforpatientswithtinnitusaloneortinnituscombinedwithhyperacusis