Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
<strong>Introduction</strong> Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support g...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
| _version_ | 1797101240766693376 |
|---|---|
| author | Bender, JL Babinski, S Wong, G Tricco, AC Englesakis, M Cyr, AB Potts, H Perski, O Esplen, MJ Young, C Wassersug, R Forster, V Papadakos, J Soobiah, C Fox, C Gothard-Huang, A Witteman, H |
| author_facet | Bender, JL Babinski, S Wong, G Tricco, AC Englesakis, M Cyr, AB Potts, H Perski, O Esplen, MJ Young, C Wassersug, R Forster, V Papadakos, J Soobiah, C Fox, C Gothard-Huang, A Witteman, H |
| author_sort | Bender, JL |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <strong>Introduction</strong> Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support groups can increase distress. Yet no studies theorise the complex, context-dependent mechanisms by which cancer online support groups generate their—sometimes contrasting—outcomes.
<br>
<strong>Methods and analysis</strong> Guided by an integrated knowledge translation approach and the strategy for patient-oriented research, we will conduct a realist review of cancer online support groups in partnership with stakeholders. We will follow Pawson’s five steps and existing quality standards to develop a program theory that explains how cancer online support groups work, for whom and in what circumstances. The specific research questions will be: what positive and negative outcomes have been reported on cancer online support groups? What are the mechanisms that are associated with these outcomes, in which contexts and for whom? Through a rigorous review of relevant scientific and grey literature, as well as ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, a program theory will be developed to explain who benefits from cancer online support groups and who does not, what benefits they derive (or do not), and the factors that affect these outcomes.
<br>
<strong>Ethics and dissemination</strong> The use of secondary data for this review precludes the need for ethical approval. Dissemination will be informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and will consist of tailored knowledge products that are conceived of collaboratively with stakeholders. These will include peer-reviewed publications on how cancer online support groups can be optimised and best practice recommendations to maximise the benefits experienced by people with cancer. These traditional scientific outputs, along with their respective evidence summaries, will be amplified through strategic social media events hosted and promoted by knowledge users.
<br>
<strong>PROSPERO registration number</strong> CRD42021250046. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:00Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e8344cd9-f285-4f71-a9c3-e70398a7d95d |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:00Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e8344cd9-f285-4f71-a9c3-e70398a7d95d2022-03-27T10:44:57ZEstablishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e8344cd9-f285-4f71-a9c3-e70398a7d95dEnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2021Bender, JLBabinski, SWong, GTricco, ACEnglesakis, MCyr, ABPotts, HPerski, OEsplen, MJYoung, CWassersug, RForster, VPapadakos, JSoobiah, CFox, CGothard-Huang, AWitteman, H<strong>Introduction</strong> Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support groups can increase distress. Yet no studies theorise the complex, context-dependent mechanisms by which cancer online support groups generate their—sometimes contrasting—outcomes. <br> <strong>Methods and analysis</strong> Guided by an integrated knowledge translation approach and the strategy for patient-oriented research, we will conduct a realist review of cancer online support groups in partnership with stakeholders. We will follow Pawson’s five steps and existing quality standards to develop a program theory that explains how cancer online support groups work, for whom and in what circumstances. The specific research questions will be: what positive and negative outcomes have been reported on cancer online support groups? What are the mechanisms that are associated with these outcomes, in which contexts and for whom? Through a rigorous review of relevant scientific and grey literature, as well as ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, a program theory will be developed to explain who benefits from cancer online support groups and who does not, what benefits they derive (or do not), and the factors that affect these outcomes. <br> <strong>Ethics and dissemination</strong> The use of secondary data for this review precludes the need for ethical approval. Dissemination will be informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and will consist of tailored knowledge products that are conceived of collaboratively with stakeholders. These will include peer-reviewed publications on how cancer online support groups can be optimised and best practice recommendations to maximise the benefits experienced by people with cancer. These traditional scientific outputs, along with their respective evidence summaries, will be amplified through strategic social media events hosted and promoted by knowledge users. <br> <strong>PROSPERO registration number</strong> CRD42021250046. |
| spellingShingle | Bender, JL Babinski, S Wong, G Tricco, AC Englesakis, M Cyr, AB Potts, H Perski, O Esplen, MJ Young, C Wassersug, R Forster, V Papadakos, J Soobiah, C Fox, C Gothard-Huang, A Witteman, H Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title | Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title_full | Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title_fullStr | Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title_short | Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review |
| title_sort | establishing best practices in cancer online support groups protocol for a realist review |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benderjl establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT babinskis establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT wongg establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT triccoac establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT englesakism establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT cyrab establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT pottsh establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT perskio establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT esplenmj establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT youngc establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT wassersugr establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT forsterv establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT papadakosj establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT soobiahc establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT foxc establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT gothardhuanga establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview AT wittemanh establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview |