How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments
This article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert’s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert’s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
ProtoSociology
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797101244295151616 |
|---|---|
| author | Zahavi, D León, F |
| author_facet | Zahavi, D León, F |
| author_sort | Zahavi, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert’s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert’s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research from developmental psychology challenges the necessity of joint commitments for collective emotions. In that section, we also raise a more principled objection to Gilbert’s account, independently of developmental considerations. Section 5 develops a complementary line of argument, focused on the notion of mutual recognition. While we agree with Gilbert that mutual recognition has an important role to play in an account of collective emotions, we take issue with her attempt to analyse face-to-face based mutual recognition in terms of the concept of joint commitment. We conclude by sketching an alternative analysis of collective emotions that highlights the role of interpersonal identification and socially mediated self-consciousness. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:04Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e83801b9-7d21-4ca9-8974-7b641e01446a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:04Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | ProtoSociology |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e83801b9-7d21-4ca9-8974-7b641e01446a2022-03-27T10:45:04ZHow we feel: collective emotions without joint commitmentsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e83801b9-7d21-4ca9-8974-7b641e01446aSymplectic Elements at OxfordProtoSociology2019Zahavi, DLeón, FThis article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert’s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert’s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research from developmental psychology challenges the necessity of joint commitments for collective emotions. In that section, we also raise a more principled objection to Gilbert’s account, independently of developmental considerations. Section 5 develops a complementary line of argument, focused on the notion of mutual recognition. While we agree with Gilbert that mutual recognition has an important role to play in an account of collective emotions, we take issue with her attempt to analyse face-to-face based mutual recognition in terms of the concept of joint commitment. We conclude by sketching an alternative analysis of collective emotions that highlights the role of interpersonal identification and socially mediated self-consciousness. |
| spellingShingle | Zahavi, D León, F How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title | How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title_full | How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title_fullStr | How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title_full_unstemmed | How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title_short | How we feel: collective emotions without joint commitments |
| title_sort | how we feel collective emotions without joint commitments |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zahavid howwefeelcollectiveemotionswithoutjointcommitments AT leonf howwefeelcollectiveemotionswithoutjointcommitments |