Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models
We evaluate black carbon (BC) model predictions from the AeroCom model intercomparison project by considering the diversity among year 2000 model simulations and comparing model predictions with available measurements. These model-measurement intercomparisons include BC surface and aircraft concentr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2009
|
| _version_ | 1797101253815173120 |
|---|---|
| author | Koch, D Schulz, M Kinne, S McNaughton, C Spackman, JR Balkanski, Y Bauer, S Berntsen, T Bond, T Boucher, O Chin, M Clarke, A De Luca, N Dentener, F Diehl, T Dubovik, O Easter, R Fahey, D Feichter, J Fillmore, D Freitag, S Ghan, S Ginoux, P Gong, S Horowitz, L |
| author_facet | Koch, D Schulz, M Kinne, S McNaughton, C Spackman, JR Balkanski, Y Bauer, S Berntsen, T Bond, T Boucher, O Chin, M Clarke, A De Luca, N Dentener, F Diehl, T Dubovik, O Easter, R Fahey, D Feichter, J Fillmore, D Freitag, S Ghan, S Ginoux, P Gong, S Horowitz, L |
| author_sort | Koch, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | We evaluate black carbon (BC) model predictions from the AeroCom model intercomparison project by considering the diversity among year 2000 model simulations and comparing model predictions with available measurements. These model-measurement intercomparisons include BC surface and aircraft concentrations, aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) retrievals from AERONET and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and BC column estimations based on AERONET. In regions other than Asia, most models are biased high compared to surface concentration measurements. However compared with (column) AAOD or BC burden retreivals, the models are generally biased low. The average ratio of model to retrieved AAOD is less than 0.7 in South American and 0.6 in African biomass burning regions; both of these regions lack surface concentration measurements. In Asia the average model to observed ratio is 0.7 for AAOD and 0.5 for BC surface concentrations. Compared with aircraft measurements over the Americas at latitudes between 0 and 50N, the average model is a factor of 8 larger than observed, and most models exceed the measured BC standard deviation in the mid to upper troposphere. At higher latitudes the average model to aircraft BC ratio is 0.4 and models underestimate the observed BC loading in the lower and middle troposphere associated with springtime Arctic haze. Low model bias for AAOD but overestimation of surface and upper atmospheric BC concentrations at lower latitudes suggests that most models are underestimating BC absorption and should improve estimates for refractive index, particle size, and optical effects of BC coating. Retrieval uncertainties and/or differences with model diagnostic treatment may also contribute to the model-measurement disparity. Largest AeroCom model diversity occurred in northern Eurasia and the remote Arctic, regions influenced by anthropogenic sources. Changing emissions, aging, removal, or optical properties within a single model generated a smaller change in model predictions than the range represented by the full set of AeroCom models. Upper tropospheric concentrations of BC mass from the aircraft measurements are suggested to provide a unique new benchmark to test scavenging and vertical dispersion of BC in global models. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:12Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e84788d6-fb92-40b5-88af-5264f36e4590 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:49:12Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e84788d6-fb92-40b5-88af-5264f36e45902022-03-27T10:45:31ZEvaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol modelsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e84788d6-fb92-40b5-88af-5264f36e4590EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Koch, DSchulz, MKinne, SMcNaughton, CSpackman, JRBalkanski, YBauer, SBerntsen, TBond, TBoucher, OChin, MClarke, ADe Luca, NDentener, FDiehl, TDubovik, OEaster, RFahey, DFeichter, JFillmore, DFreitag, SGhan, SGinoux, PGong, SHorowitz, LWe evaluate black carbon (BC) model predictions from the AeroCom model intercomparison project by considering the diversity among year 2000 model simulations and comparing model predictions with available measurements. These model-measurement intercomparisons include BC surface and aircraft concentrations, aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) retrievals from AERONET and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and BC column estimations based on AERONET. In regions other than Asia, most models are biased high compared to surface concentration measurements. However compared with (column) AAOD or BC burden retreivals, the models are generally biased low. The average ratio of model to retrieved AAOD is less than 0.7 in South American and 0.6 in African biomass burning regions; both of these regions lack surface concentration measurements. In Asia the average model to observed ratio is 0.7 for AAOD and 0.5 for BC surface concentrations. Compared with aircraft measurements over the Americas at latitudes between 0 and 50N, the average model is a factor of 8 larger than observed, and most models exceed the measured BC standard deviation in the mid to upper troposphere. At higher latitudes the average model to aircraft BC ratio is 0.4 and models underestimate the observed BC loading in the lower and middle troposphere associated with springtime Arctic haze. Low model bias for AAOD but overestimation of surface and upper atmospheric BC concentrations at lower latitudes suggests that most models are underestimating BC absorption and should improve estimates for refractive index, particle size, and optical effects of BC coating. Retrieval uncertainties and/or differences with model diagnostic treatment may also contribute to the model-measurement disparity. Largest AeroCom model diversity occurred in northern Eurasia and the remote Arctic, regions influenced by anthropogenic sources. Changing emissions, aging, removal, or optical properties within a single model generated a smaller change in model predictions than the range represented by the full set of AeroCom models. Upper tropospheric concentrations of BC mass from the aircraft measurements are suggested to provide a unique new benchmark to test scavenging and vertical dispersion of BC in global models. |
| spellingShingle | Koch, D Schulz, M Kinne, S McNaughton, C Spackman, JR Balkanski, Y Bauer, S Berntsen, T Bond, T Boucher, O Chin, M Clarke, A De Luca, N Dentener, F Diehl, T Dubovik, O Easter, R Fahey, D Feichter, J Fillmore, D Freitag, S Ghan, S Ginoux, P Gong, S Horowitz, L Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title | Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title_full | Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title_short | Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| title_sort | evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kochd evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT schulzm evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT kinnes evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT mcnaughtonc evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT spackmanjr evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT balkanskiy evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT bauers evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT berntsent evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT bondt evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT bouchero evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT chinm evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT clarkea evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT delucan evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT dentenerf evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT diehlt evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT duboviko evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT easterr evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT faheyd evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT feichterj evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT fillmored evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT freitags evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT ghans evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT ginouxp evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT gongs evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels AT horowitzl evaluationofblackcarbonestimationsinglobalaerosolmodels |