Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world

<p>At its greatest extent, the Roman empire represented one of the largest continuous areas of land to have been ruled by a single central administration in the classical period. While the extent of the empire may be determined from both the extensive body of literary evidence from the Roman w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simon, J
Other Authors: Howard-Johnston, J
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
_version_ 1826302570899963904
author Simon, J
author2 Howard-Johnston, J
author_facet Howard-Johnston, J
Simon, J
author_sort Simon, J
collection OXFORD
description <p>At its greatest extent, the Roman empire represented one of the largest continuous areas of land to have been ruled by a single central administration in the classical period. While the extent of the empire may be determined from both the extensive body of literary evidence from the Roman world, and also from the physi- cal remains of great public works stretching from Britain to Arabia, the processes by which the Romans were able to apprehend larger spaces remain infrequently studied in modern scholarship. It is often assumed that Roman spatial awareness came from cartographic representations and that the imperial Roman administration must have possessed detailed scale maps of both individual regions and of the empire as a whole.</p> <p>In the first part of the present study, it is demonstrated that Roman spatial understanding may not have relied very extensively on cartography, and that any maps produced in the Roman world were designed to serve very different purposes from those that we might associate with maps today. Instead, it is argued that the extensive construction projects that defined the character of the imperial world would have pro- vided a means by which the larger physical spaces of the empire could be understood.</p> <p>However, as transformations began to occur within the built environment between the late-third and late-sixth centuries, spatial processes would have necessarily started to change. In the second part of the present study, it is suggested that attitudes toward the built environment would have led to changes in the physical arrangement of rural and urban spaces in late antiquity; furthermore the eventual dissolution of the constructed landscape that defined the Roman empire would have resulted in new approaches to the apprehension of larger spaces, approaches in which cartographic expression may have played a more central role.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:49:35Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:e86a09f5-a1da-4ac0-8051-ba7fca36c16e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:49:35Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:e86a09f5-a1da-4ac0-8051-ba7fca36c16e2022-03-27T10:46:22ZImages of the built landscape in the later Roman worldThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:e86a09f5-a1da-4ac0-8051-ba7fca36c16eHistoryHistory of the ancient worldLate antiquity and the Middle AgesEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2012Simon, JHoward-Johnston, J<p>At its greatest extent, the Roman empire represented one of the largest continuous areas of land to have been ruled by a single central administration in the classical period. While the extent of the empire may be determined from both the extensive body of literary evidence from the Roman world, and also from the physi- cal remains of great public works stretching from Britain to Arabia, the processes by which the Romans were able to apprehend larger spaces remain infrequently studied in modern scholarship. It is often assumed that Roman spatial awareness came from cartographic representations and that the imperial Roman administration must have possessed detailed scale maps of both individual regions and of the empire as a whole.</p> <p>In the first part of the present study, it is demonstrated that Roman spatial understanding may not have relied very extensively on cartography, and that any maps produced in the Roman world were designed to serve very different purposes from those that we might associate with maps today. Instead, it is argued that the extensive construction projects that defined the character of the imperial world would have pro- vided a means by which the larger physical spaces of the empire could be understood.</p> <p>However, as transformations began to occur within the built environment between the late-third and late-sixth centuries, spatial processes would have necessarily started to change. In the second part of the present study, it is suggested that attitudes toward the built environment would have led to changes in the physical arrangement of rural and urban spaces in late antiquity; furthermore the eventual dissolution of the constructed landscape that defined the Roman empire would have resulted in new approaches to the apprehension of larger spaces, approaches in which cartographic expression may have played a more central role.</p>
spellingShingle History
History of the ancient world
Late antiquity and the Middle Ages
Simon, J
Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title_full Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title_fullStr Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title_full_unstemmed Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title_short Images of the built landscape in the later Roman world
title_sort images of the built landscape in the later roman world
topic History
History of the ancient world
Late antiquity and the Middle Ages
work_keys_str_mv AT simonj imagesofthebuiltlandscapeinthelaterromanworld