Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies in medical imaging.
<br><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically examine the design, reporting standards, risk of bias, and claims of studies comparing the performance of diagnostic deep learning algorithms for medical imaging with that of expert clinicians.</br> <br><strong>De...
Main Authors: | Nagendran, M, Chen, Y, Lovejoy, CA, Gordon, AC, Komorowski, M, Harvey, H, Topol, EJ, Ioannidis, JPA, Collins, GS, Maruthappu, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Very large treatment effects in randomised trials as an empirical marker to indicate whether subsequent trials are necessary: meta-epidemiological assessment
by: Nagendran, M, et al.
Published: (2016) -
DIGITAL MEASUREMENT STRATEGY IS ROBUST IN NONEXPERT HANDS IN MEASURING CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFUSIONS ON CHEST RADIOGRAPH
by: Nagendran, M, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Should the NHS be privatized? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 22 January 2010
by: Maruthappu Mahiben, et al.
Published: (2010-05-01) -
Claims and the standard form of building contract/
by: 268215 Burke, H. T.
Published: (1976) -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis
by: Maria Paz Salinas, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)