Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2
Examines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport on whether the process for passing the Bill authorising plans for the high-speed rail network (HS2) would breach Directive 2011/92 (Environmental Impact Assessment Directive) art.1...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Sweet and Maxwell
2014
|
| _version_ | 1797101541690179584 |
|---|---|
| author | Craig, P |
| author_facet | Craig, P |
| author_sort | Craig, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Examines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport on whether the process for passing the Bill authorising plans for the high-speed rail network (HS2) would breach Directive 2011/92 (Environmental Impact Assessment Directive) art.1(4) as the Bill would be subject to a whipped rather than a free vote. Analyses the constitutional law issues raised in the case, including: (1) the supremacy of EU law principle; (2) the court's relationship with the European Court of Justice; and (3) the recognition of constitutional instruments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:53:18Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:e9a57fd5-2561-4844-9dbc-0e32ac77ceb3 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T05:53:18Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Sweet and Maxwell |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:e9a57fd5-2561-4844-9dbc-0e32ac77ceb32022-03-27T10:55:47ZConstitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:e9a57fd5-2561-4844-9dbc-0e32ac77ceb3Symplectic Elements at OxfordSweet and Maxwell2014Craig, PExamines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport on whether the process for passing the Bill authorising plans for the high-speed rail network (HS2) would breach Directive 2011/92 (Environmental Impact Assessment Directive) art.1(4) as the Bill would be subject to a whipped rather than a free vote. Analyses the constitutional law issues raised in the case, including: (1) the supremacy of EU law principle; (2) the court's relationship with the European Court of Justice; and (3) the recognition of constitutional instruments. |
| spellingShingle | Craig, P Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title | Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title_full | Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title_fullStr | Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title_short | Constitutionalizing constitutional law: HS2 |
| title_sort | constitutionalizing constitutional law hs2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT craigp constitutionalizingconstitutionallawhs2 |