Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth

Among the primates, <em>Homo sapiens</em> has evolved a life history which includes long gestation, relatively slow growth to reproductive maturity, and large body size. While the slow growth rate may be linked to the energetic demands of having a large brain, there are other important m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ulijaszek, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-Liss, Inc. 2002
Subjects:
_version_ 1826302923190042624
author Ulijaszek, S
author_facet Ulijaszek, S
author_sort Ulijaszek, S
collection OXFORD
description Among the primates, <em>Homo sapiens</em> has evolved a life history which includes long gestation, relatively slow growth to reproductive maturity, and large body size. While the slow growth rate may be linked to the energetic demands of having a large brain, there are other important morphological and physiological linkages that may be adaptive, including the development of significant fat stores with which to buffer against episodic and periodic energetic stress. In this comparative analysis of the energetic burden of pregnancy among primates (including humans), the daily energy investment in the development of neonatal tissue is modeled. During pregnancy, larger primates, notably the <em>Hominidae</em>, invest a smaller proportion of their maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget in fetal tissue with increasing energy budget, allowing diverse adaptations, including foraging strategies which include folivory and mixed patterns of food getting, and meat consumption. Humans have a similar proportion of maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget invested in fetal tissue with increasing energy budget to other apes and have a diet which is of much higher quality than predicted for body size and metabolic needs. The combination of high diet quality and low proportion of maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget invested in fetal tissue allows greater brain size relative to body weight at birth compared with all other primates, apart from chimpanzees, and higher birthweight and body fatness at birth for a given body size than other primate species. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:54:49Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ea2baef4-21d2-43d8-b8db-1b87b5fabdb0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:54:49Z
publishDate 2002
publisher Wiley-Liss, Inc.
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ea2baef4-21d2-43d8-b8db-1b87b5fabdb02022-03-27T10:59:36ZComparative energetics of primate fetal growthJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ea2baef4-21d2-43d8-b8db-1b87b5fabdb0Development (zoology)AnthropologyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetWiley-Liss, Inc.2002Ulijaszek, SAmong the primates, <em>Homo sapiens</em> has evolved a life history which includes long gestation, relatively slow growth to reproductive maturity, and large body size. While the slow growth rate may be linked to the energetic demands of having a large brain, there are other important morphological and physiological linkages that may be adaptive, including the development of significant fat stores with which to buffer against episodic and periodic energetic stress. In this comparative analysis of the energetic burden of pregnancy among primates (including humans), the daily energy investment in the development of neonatal tissue is modeled. During pregnancy, larger primates, notably the <em>Hominidae</em>, invest a smaller proportion of their maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget in fetal tissue with increasing energy budget, allowing diverse adaptations, including foraging strategies which include folivory and mixed patterns of food getting, and meat consumption. Humans have a similar proportion of maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget invested in fetal tissue with increasing energy budget to other apes and have a diet which is of much higher quality than predicted for body size and metabolic needs. The combination of high diet quality and low proportion of maternal daily nonmaintenance energy budget invested in fetal tissue allows greater brain size relative to body weight at birth compared with all other primates, apart from chimpanzees, and higher birthweight and body fatness at birth for a given body size than other primate species. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
spellingShingle Development (zoology)
Anthropology
Ulijaszek, S
Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title_full Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title_fullStr Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title_full_unstemmed Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title_short Comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
title_sort comparative energetics of primate fetal growth
topic Development (zoology)
Anthropology
work_keys_str_mv AT ulijaszeks comparativeenergeticsofprimatefetalgrowth