Avoiding tenancy legislation: sham and contracting out revisited
This article considers the approach taken to devices that are designed to avoid tenancy legislation, exploring the doctrines of shame, pretence, contracting out and the 'artificial device doctrine' developed in tax cases. It is argued that the legal response takes two stages. The first jud...
| Hoofdauteur: | |
|---|---|
| Andere auteurs: | |
| Formaat: | Journal article |
| Taal: | English |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Cambridge University Press
2002
|
| Onderwerpen: |