The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab

Computational modelling of cardiac cellular electrophysiology has a long history, with many models now available for different species, cell types, and experimental preparations. This success brings with it a challenge: how do we assess and compare the underlying hypotheses and emergent behaviours,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cooper, J, Scharm, M, Mirams, G
Format: Journal article
Published: Cell Press 2016
_version_ 1797101832442478592
author Cooper, J
Scharm, M
Mirams, G
author_facet Cooper, J
Scharm, M
Mirams, G
author_sort Cooper, J
collection OXFORD
description Computational modelling of cardiac cellular electrophysiology has a long history, with many models now available for different species, cell types, and experimental preparations. This success brings with it a challenge: how do we assess and compare the underlying hypotheses and emergent behaviours, in order to choose a model as a suitable basis for a new study, or characterize how a particular model behaves in different scenarios? We have created an online resource for the characterization and comparison of electrophysiological cell models under a wide range of experimental scenarios. The details of the mathematical model (quantitative assumptions and hypotheses formulated as ordinary differential equations) are separated from the experimental protocol being simulated. Each model and protocol is then encoded in computer-readable formats. A simulation tool runs virtual experiments on models encoded in CellML, and a website – https://chaste.cs.ox.ac.uk/WebLab – provides a friendly interface, allowing users to store and compare results. The system currently contains a sample of 36 models and 23 protocols, including current-voltage curve generation, action potential properties under steady pacing at different rates, restitution properties, block of particular channels, and hypo-/hyper-kalaemia. This resource is publicly available, open source, and free; and we invite the community to use it and become involved in future developments. Those interested in comparing competing hypotheses using models can make a more informed decision; those developing new models can upload them for easy evaluation under the existing protocols, and even add their own protocols.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:57:29Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:eb085a3f-a34d-423d-b85f-4870453cfa8d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:57:29Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Cell Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:eb085a3f-a34d-423d-b85f-4870453cfa8d2022-03-27T11:06:37ZThe Cardiac Electrophysiology Web LabJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:eb085a3f-a34d-423d-b85f-4870453cfa8dSymplectic Elements at OxfordCell Press2016Cooper, JScharm, MMirams, GComputational modelling of cardiac cellular electrophysiology has a long history, with many models now available for different species, cell types, and experimental preparations. This success brings with it a challenge: how do we assess and compare the underlying hypotheses and emergent behaviours, in order to choose a model as a suitable basis for a new study, or characterize how a particular model behaves in different scenarios? We have created an online resource for the characterization and comparison of electrophysiological cell models under a wide range of experimental scenarios. The details of the mathematical model (quantitative assumptions and hypotheses formulated as ordinary differential equations) are separated from the experimental protocol being simulated. Each model and protocol is then encoded in computer-readable formats. A simulation tool runs virtual experiments on models encoded in CellML, and a website – https://chaste.cs.ox.ac.uk/WebLab – provides a friendly interface, allowing users to store and compare results. The system currently contains a sample of 36 models and 23 protocols, including current-voltage curve generation, action potential properties under steady pacing at different rates, restitution properties, block of particular channels, and hypo-/hyper-kalaemia. This resource is publicly available, open source, and free; and we invite the community to use it and become involved in future developments. Those interested in comparing competing hypotheses using models can make a more informed decision; those developing new models can upload them for easy evaluation under the existing protocols, and even add their own protocols.
spellingShingle Cooper, J
Scharm, M
Mirams, G
The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title_full The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title_fullStr The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title_full_unstemmed The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title_short The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab
title_sort cardiac electrophysiology web lab
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperj thecardiacelectrophysiologyweblab
AT scharmm thecardiacelectrophysiologyweblab
AT miramsg thecardiacelectrophysiologyweblab
AT cooperj cardiacelectrophysiologyweblab
AT scharmm cardiacelectrophysiologyweblab
AT miramsg cardiacelectrophysiologyweblab