Silver acetate for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND: Silver acetate produces an unpleasant taste when combined with cigarettes, thereby producing an aversive stimulus. It has been marketed in various forms with the aim of extinguishing the urge to smoke, by pairing the urge with an unpleasant stimulus. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lancaster, T, Stead, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2000
_version_ 1826303111835156480
author Lancaster, T
Stead, L
author_facet Lancaster, T
Stead, L
author_sort Lancaster, T
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Silver acetate produces an unpleasant taste when combined with cigarettes, thereby producing an aversive stimulus. It has been marketed in various forms with the aim of extinguishing the urge to smoke, by pairing the urge with an unpleasant stimulus. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness of silver acetate products (gum, lozenge, spray) in promoting smoking cessation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of silver acetate for smoking cessation with reports of smoking status at least six months after the beginning of treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of subjects, the dose and form of silver acetate, the outcome measures, method of randomisation, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was biochemically validated abstinence from smoking after at least six months follow-up in patients smoking at baseline. Subjects lost to follow-up were counted as continuing smokers. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a fixed effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies provided long-term follow-up data on patients randomised to silver acetate or placebo. In one of these studies, there was a third arm, randomised to 2mg nicotine gum. The combined odds ratio for quitting for silver acetate vs placebo was 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.73). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Existing trials show little evidence for a specific effect of silver acetate in promoting smoking cessation. The confidence intervals for the ratio are quite wide. However, the upper limit of the confidence intervals for a positive effect equates to an absolute increase in the smoking cessation rate of about 4%. Any effect of this agent is therefore likely to be smaller than nicotine replacement therapy. The lack of effect of silver acetate may reflect poor compliance with a treatment whose rationale is to create an unpleasant stimulus.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:57:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:eb164ad3-ff81-4504-9cbf-64879fa8e85a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:57:40Z
publishDate 2000
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:eb164ad3-ff81-4504-9cbf-64879fa8e85a2022-03-27T11:07:04ZSilver acetate for smoking cessation.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:eb164ad3-ff81-4504-9cbf-64879fa8e85aEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2000Lancaster, TStead, L BACKGROUND: Silver acetate produces an unpleasant taste when combined with cigarettes, thereby producing an aversive stimulus. It has been marketed in various forms with the aim of extinguishing the urge to smoke, by pairing the urge with an unpleasant stimulus. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness of silver acetate products (gum, lozenge, spray) in promoting smoking cessation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of silver acetate for smoking cessation with reports of smoking status at least six months after the beginning of treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of subjects, the dose and form of silver acetate, the outcome measures, method of randomisation, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was biochemically validated abstinence from smoking after at least six months follow-up in patients smoking at baseline. Subjects lost to follow-up were counted as continuing smokers. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a fixed effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies provided long-term follow-up data on patients randomised to silver acetate or placebo. In one of these studies, there was a third arm, randomised to 2mg nicotine gum. The combined odds ratio for quitting for silver acetate vs placebo was 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.73). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Existing trials show little evidence for a specific effect of silver acetate in promoting smoking cessation. The confidence intervals for the ratio are quite wide. However, the upper limit of the confidence intervals for a positive effect equates to an absolute increase in the smoking cessation rate of about 4%. Any effect of this agent is therefore likely to be smaller than nicotine replacement therapy. The lack of effect of silver acetate may reflect poor compliance with a treatment whose rationale is to create an unpleasant stimulus.
spellingShingle Lancaster, T
Stead, L
Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title_full Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title_fullStr Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title_full_unstemmed Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title_short Silver acetate for smoking cessation.
title_sort silver acetate for smoking cessation
work_keys_str_mv AT lancastert silveracetateforsmokingcessation
AT steadl silveracetateforsmokingcessation