In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of morphology of surgical meshes on the course of bacterial infection under the influence of the host immune system in an in vivo chronic bacterial infection model. BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic meshes has increased dramatically the last decades in abdominal wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Engelsman, A, Dam, v, van der Mei, H, Busscher, H, Ploeg, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797101888234061824
author Engelsman, A
Dam, v
van der Mei, H
Busscher, H
Ploeg, R
author_facet Engelsman, A
Dam, v
van der Mei, H
Busscher, H
Ploeg, R
author_sort Engelsman, A
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of morphology of surgical meshes on the course of bacterial infection under the influence of the host immune system in an in vivo chronic bacterial infection model. BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic meshes has increased dramatically the last decades in abdominal wall reconstructive surgery. Whereas infection is becoming a more frequent complication, attention is increasingly drawn to the influence of the surgeon's mesh choice on the course of this complication. METHODS: Samples of 6 often applied surgical meshes were contaminated with a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus and implanted subcutaneously in an immunocompetent BALB/c mouse. The intensity and the spreading of bioluminescence (ie, p/s/cm/sr) were analyzed non-invasively in vivo during a 10-day follow-up period. RESULTS: Over the course of infection, multifilament polypropylene and hydrophobic materials showed a significantly higher persistence of bacteria as well as spreading of infection compared to all other meshes. In contrast, infection resolved in almost all animals with a low-weight polyester mesh. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are in accordance with circumstantial evidence from limited clinical reports on infection involving surgical meshes and suggest that multifilament and hydrophobic meshes significantly increase bacterial persistence or spreading in the infected area in contrast to monofilament polypropylene and lightweight meshes. Therefore, the surgeon should consider this outcome when choosing a mesh graft for limiting infection in abdominal wall repair.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:58:19Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:eb4893d6-680f-4fd7-b7c6-0862f808f031
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:58:19Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:eb4893d6-680f-4fd7-b7c6-0862f808f0312022-03-27T11:08:31ZIn vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:eb4893d6-680f-4fd7-b7c6-0862f808f031EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Engelsman, ADam, vvan der Mei, HBusscher, HPloeg, R OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of morphology of surgical meshes on the course of bacterial infection under the influence of the host immune system in an in vivo chronic bacterial infection model. BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic meshes has increased dramatically the last decades in abdominal wall reconstructive surgery. Whereas infection is becoming a more frequent complication, attention is increasingly drawn to the influence of the surgeon's mesh choice on the course of this complication. METHODS: Samples of 6 often applied surgical meshes were contaminated with a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus and implanted subcutaneously in an immunocompetent BALB/c mouse. The intensity and the spreading of bioluminescence (ie, p/s/cm/sr) were analyzed non-invasively in vivo during a 10-day follow-up period. RESULTS: Over the course of infection, multifilament polypropylene and hydrophobic materials showed a significantly higher persistence of bacteria as well as spreading of infection compared to all other meshes. In contrast, infection resolved in almost all animals with a low-weight polyester mesh. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are in accordance with circumstantial evidence from limited clinical reports on infection involving surgical meshes and suggest that multifilament and hydrophobic meshes significantly increase bacterial persistence or spreading in the infected area in contrast to monofilament polypropylene and lightweight meshes. Therefore, the surgeon should consider this outcome when choosing a mesh graft for limiting infection in abdominal wall repair.
spellingShingle Engelsman, A
Dam, v
van der Mei, H
Busscher, H
Ploeg, R
In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title_full In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title_fullStr In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title_full_unstemmed In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title_short In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.
title_sort in vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes
work_keys_str_mv AT engelsmana invivoevaluationofbacterialinfectioninvolvingmorphologicallydifferentsurgicalmeshes
AT damv invivoevaluationofbacterialinfectioninvolvingmorphologicallydifferentsurgicalmeshes
AT vandermeih invivoevaluationofbacterialinfectioninvolvingmorphologicallydifferentsurgicalmeshes
AT busscherh invivoevaluationofbacterialinfectioninvolvingmorphologicallydifferentsurgicalmeshes
AT ploegr invivoevaluationofbacterialinfectioninvolvingmorphologicallydifferentsurgicalmeshes