Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers
Previous theorists have claimed that Russell’s theory of definite descriptions gives the wrong truth conditions to sentences in which definite descriptions are embedded under certain other operators; but the other operators used, such as conditionals and propositional attitude verbs, have introduced...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
| _version_ | 1797102018539552768 |
|---|---|
| author | Elbourne, P |
| author_facet | Elbourne, P |
| author_sort | Elbourne, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Previous theorists have claimed that Russell’s theory of definite descriptions gives the wrong truth conditions to sentences in which definite descriptions are embedded under certain other operators; but the other operators used, such as conditionals and propositional attitude verbs, have introduced intensional and hyperintensional complications that might be thought to obscure the point against Russell. This paper shows that the same kind of problem arises when the operator in question (English ‘no’) allows the context to be extensional. It is further argued that presuppositional theories of definite descriptions give intuitively satisfying analyses of the novel data. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:00:02Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:ebda5982-af7a-4fa9-a274-321a6add571e |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:00:02Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ebda5982-af7a-4fa9-a274-321a6add571e2022-03-27T11:13:05ZDefinite descriptions and negative existential quantifiersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ebda5982-af7a-4fa9-a274-321a6add571eSymplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Netherlands2017Elbourne, PPrevious theorists have claimed that Russell’s theory of definite descriptions gives the wrong truth conditions to sentences in which definite descriptions are embedded under certain other operators; but the other operators used, such as conditionals and propositional attitude verbs, have introduced intensional and hyperintensional complications that might be thought to obscure the point against Russell. This paper shows that the same kind of problem arises when the operator in question (English ‘no’) allows the context to be extensional. It is further argued that presuppositional theories of definite descriptions give intuitively satisfying analyses of the novel data. |
| spellingShingle | Elbourne, P Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title | Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title_full | Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title_fullStr | Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title_short | Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| title_sort | definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elbournep definitedescriptionsandnegativeexistentialquantifiers |