Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases

Presents a study into the capacity of judges to exercise their discretion in a way consistent with procedural fairness in housing possession cases in which social landlords seek possession against a tenant for rent arrears. Reviews the relevant legal framework, the meaning of procedural fairness, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Whitehouse, L, Bright, S, Dhami, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Sweet and Maxwell 2019
_version_ 1797102107315142656
author Whitehouse, L
Bright, S
Dhami, M
author_facet Whitehouse, L
Bright, S
Dhami, M
author_sort Whitehouse, L
collection OXFORD
description Presents a study into the capacity of judges to exercise their discretion in a way consistent with procedural fairness in housing possession cases in which social landlords seek possession against a tenant for rent arrears. Reviews the relevant legal framework, the meaning of procedural fairness, and the ways in which possession cases fail to meet its requirements. Considers how decision-makers are likely to operate in possession cases, and how fairness could be improved.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:01:13Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ec3f6e1a-9536-45ff-bd83-684a0f611407
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:01:13Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Sweet and Maxwell
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ec3f6e1a-9536-45ff-bd83-684a0f6114072022-03-27T11:16:04ZImproving procedural fairness in housing possession casesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ec3f6e1a-9536-45ff-bd83-684a0f611407EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSweet and Maxwell2019Whitehouse, LBright, SDhami, MPresents a study into the capacity of judges to exercise their discretion in a way consistent with procedural fairness in housing possession cases in which social landlords seek possession against a tenant for rent arrears. Reviews the relevant legal framework, the meaning of procedural fairness, and the ways in which possession cases fail to meet its requirements. Considers how decision-makers are likely to operate in possession cases, and how fairness could be improved.
spellingShingle Whitehouse, L
Bright, S
Dhami, M
Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title_full Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title_fullStr Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title_full_unstemmed Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title_short Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
title_sort improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
work_keys_str_mv AT whitehousel improvingproceduralfairnessinhousingpossessioncases
AT brights improvingproceduralfairnessinhousingpossessioncases
AT dhamim improvingproceduralfairnessinhousingpossessioncases