Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL
The quality of clinical research in surgery has long attracted criticism. High-quality randomised trials have proved difficult to undertake in surgery, and many surgical treatments have therefore been adopted without adequate supporting evidence of efficacy and safety. This evidence deficit can adve...
Main Authors: | McCulloch, P, Feinberg, J, Philippou, Y, Kolias, A, Kehoe, S, Lancaster, G, Donovan, J, Petrinic, T, Agha, R, Pennell, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Similar Items
-
No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations
by: Hirst, A, et al.
Published: (2018) -
How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.
by: Hirst, A, et al.
Published: (2013) -
How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: The IDEAL framework for action
by: Hirst, A, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Application of the IDEAL framework to robotic urologic surgery.
by: Dahm, P, et al.
Published: (2014) -
The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation.
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2011)