Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?

Trade-driven killing for body parts has long been a major cause of population decline for a number of big cat species. There are now worrying suggestions that commercialised illegal trade in body parts might become a threat for wild lions in Africa, and recent concerns have been raised that trade in...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Coals, P, Dickman, A, Hunt, J, Grau, A, Mandisodza-Chikerema, R, Ikanda, D, Macdonald, D, Loveridge, A
Формат: Journal article
Язык:English
Опубликовано: Elsevier 2020
_version_ 1826303430791004160
author Coals, P
Dickman, A
Hunt, J
Grau, A
Mandisodza-Chikerema, R
Ikanda, D
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
author_facet Coals, P
Dickman, A
Hunt, J
Grau, A
Mandisodza-Chikerema, R
Ikanda, D
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
author_sort Coals, P
collection OXFORD
description Trade-driven killing for body parts has long been a major cause of population decline for a number of big cat species. There are now worrying suggestions that commercialised illegal trade in body parts might become a threat for wild lions in Africa, and recent concerns have been raised that trade in captive-bred lion skeletons from South Africa may have stimulated demand for lion bones, claws, and teeth and thus incentivised commercially-driven, targeted poaching of wild lions for illegal trade. However, analysis of the prevalence of commercially-driven, targeted killing of lions for body parts is currently lacking for most major lion populations. In this study we make use of detailed, long-term records of mortality and body part removal from field sites in two of Africa’s lion population strongholds, the Hwange National Park and surrounds, Zimbabwe, within the Kavango Zambezi (KAZA) Transfrontier Conservation Area and the Ruaha landscape in Tanzania, to evaluate potential cases of commercially-driven part removal and targeted killings. We find no evidence of systemic targeted killing of lions for commercial trade at either site and suggest that the majority of part removals are opportunistic and culturally-driven. Nevertheless, we stress the requirement for vigilance around the issue of lion trade and support the development of further range-wide capacity to record wild lion mortality and body part removal data.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:02:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ecb83bae-d0c7-4ec8-8549-32d6bd45532e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:02:35Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ecb83bae-d0c7-4ec8-8549-32d6bd45532e2022-03-27T11:19:40ZCommercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ecb83bae-d0c7-4ec8-8549-32d6bd45532eEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2020Coals, PDickman, AHunt, JGrau, AMandisodza-Chikerema, RIkanda, DMacdonald, DLoveridge, ATrade-driven killing for body parts has long been a major cause of population decline for a number of big cat species. There are now worrying suggestions that commercialised illegal trade in body parts might become a threat for wild lions in Africa, and recent concerns have been raised that trade in captive-bred lion skeletons from South Africa may have stimulated demand for lion bones, claws, and teeth and thus incentivised commercially-driven, targeted poaching of wild lions for illegal trade. However, analysis of the prevalence of commercially-driven, targeted killing of lions for body parts is currently lacking for most major lion populations. In this study we make use of detailed, long-term records of mortality and body part removal from field sites in two of Africa’s lion population strongholds, the Hwange National Park and surrounds, Zimbabwe, within the Kavango Zambezi (KAZA) Transfrontier Conservation Area and the Ruaha landscape in Tanzania, to evaluate potential cases of commercially-driven part removal and targeted killings. We find no evidence of systemic targeted killing of lions for commercial trade at either site and suggest that the majority of part removals are opportunistic and culturally-driven. Nevertheless, we stress the requirement for vigilance around the issue of lion trade and support the development of further range-wide capacity to record wild lion mortality and body part removal data.
spellingShingle Coals, P
Dickman, A
Hunt, J
Grau, A
Mandisodza-Chikerema, R
Ikanda, D
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title_full Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title_fullStr Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title_full_unstemmed Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title_short Commercially-driven lion part removal: what is the evidence from mortality records?
title_sort commercially driven lion part removal what is the evidence from mortality records
work_keys_str_mv AT coalsp commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT dickmana commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT huntj commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT graua commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT mandisodzachikeremar commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT ikandad commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT macdonaldd commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords
AT loveridgea commerciallydrivenlionpartremovalwhatistheevidencefrommortalityrecords