Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
Μορφή: | Journal article |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
ανά: Marco Ettore Allaix, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
ανά: Els De Vos, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
ανά: De Giorgi, R
Έκδοση: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
ανά: De Giorgi, R
Έκδοση: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
ανά: Jim McCambridge, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2011-01-01)