Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
Glavni autori: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Jezik: | English |
Izdano: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Slični predmeti
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
od: Marco Ettore Allaix, i dr.
Izdano: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
od: Els De Vos, i dr.
Izdano: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
od: De Giorgi, R
Izdano: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
od: De Giorgi, R
Izdano: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
od: Jim McCambridge, i dr.
Izdano: (2011-01-01)