Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
主要な著者: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
フォーマット: | Journal article |
言語: | English |
出版事項: |
Elsevier
2019
|
類似資料
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
著者:: Marco Ettore Allaix, 等
出版事項: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
著者:: Els De Vos, 等
出版事項: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
著者:: De Giorgi, R
出版事項: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
著者:: De Giorgi, R
出版事項: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
著者:: Jim McCambridge, 等
出版事項: (2011-01-01)