Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
Hoofdauteurs: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
door: Marco Ettore Allaix, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
door: Els De Vos, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
door: De Giorgi, R
Gepubliceerd in: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
door: De Giorgi, R
Gepubliceerd in: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
door: Jim McCambridge, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2011-01-01)