Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To systematically explore the methodological factors underpinning discrepancies in the pooled effect estimates from Cochrane reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane reviews (NCRs) systematic reviews, answering the same clinical question. <br></br>Study Design and Setting Quantitative...
Главные авторы: | Hacke, C, Nunan, D |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Схожие документы
-
LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
по: Marco Ettore Allaix, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023-07-01) -
Modernist High-Rises in Postwar Antwerp. Two Answers to the same Question
по: Els De Vos, и др.
Опубликовано: (2017-03-01) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
по: De Giorgi, R
Опубликовано: (2019) -
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
по: De Giorgi, R
Опубликовано: (2019) -
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.
по: Jim McCambridge, и др.
Опубликовано: (2011-01-01)