Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patel, A, MacMahon, S, Chalmers, J, Neal, B, Billot, L, Woodward, M, Marre, M, Cooper, M, Glasziou, P, Grobbee, D, Hamet, P, Harrap, S, Heller, S, Liu, L, Mancia, G, Mogensen, C, Pan, C, Poulter, N, Rodgers, A, Williams, B, Bompoint, S, de Galan, B, Joshi, R, Travert, F
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797102315475304448
author Patel, A
MacMahon, S
Chalmers, J
Neal, B
Billot, L
Woodward, M
Marre, M
Cooper, M
Glasziou, P
Grobbee, D
Hamet, P
Harrap, S
Heller, S
Liu, L
Mancia, G
Mogensen, C
Pan, C
Poulter, N
Rodgers, A
Williams, B
Bompoint, S
de Galan, B
Joshi, R
Travert, F
author_facet Patel, A
MacMahon, S
Chalmers, J
Neal, B
Billot, L
Woodward, M
Marre, M
Cooper, M
Glasziou, P
Grobbee, D
Hamet, P
Harrap, S
Heller, S
Liu, L
Mancia, G
Mogensen, C
Pan, C
Poulter, N
Rodgers, A
Williams, B
Bompoint, S
de Galan, B
Joshi, R
Travert, F
author_sort Patel, A
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:04:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ed493b4f-4199-4d25-a379-30326481b1ae
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:04:14Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ed493b4f-4199-4d25-a379-30326481b1ae2022-03-27T11:23:46ZIntensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ed493b4f-4199-4d25-a379-30326481b1aeEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Patel, AMacMahon, SChalmers, JNeal, BBillot, LWoodward, MMarre, MCooper, MGlasziou, PGrobbee, DHamet, PHarrap, SHeller, SLiu, LMancia, GMogensen, CPan, CPoulter, NRodgers, AWilliams, BBompoint, Sde Galan, BJoshi, RTravert, F BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)
spellingShingle Patel, A
MacMahon, S
Chalmers, J
Neal, B
Billot, L
Woodward, M
Marre, M
Cooper, M
Glasziou, P
Grobbee, D
Hamet, P
Harrap, S
Heller, S
Liu, L
Mancia, G
Mogensen, C
Pan, C
Poulter, N
Rodgers, A
Williams, B
Bompoint, S
de Galan, B
Joshi, R
Travert, F
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title_full Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title_fullStr Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title_full_unstemmed Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title_short Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
title_sort intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
work_keys_str_mv AT patela intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT macmahons intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT chalmersj intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT nealb intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT billotl intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT woodwardm intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT marrem intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT cooperm intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT glaszioup intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT grobbeed intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT hametp intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT harraps intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT hellers intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT liul intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT manciag intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT mogensenc intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT panc intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT poultern intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT rodgersa intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT williamsb intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT bompoints intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT degalanb intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT joshir intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT travertf intensivebloodglucosecontrolandvascularoutcomesinpatientswithtype2diabetes