Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen?
Why do rhizobia expend resources on fixing N(2) for the benefit of their host plant, when they could use those resources for their own reproduction? We present a series of theoretical models which counter the hypotheses that N(2) fixation is favoured because it (i) increases the exudation of useful...
Main Authors: | West, SA, Kiers, E, Simms, E, Denison, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2002
|
Similar Items
-
Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated?
by: West, SA, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.
by: Kiers, E, et al.
Published: (2003) -
How do less‐expensive nitrogen alternatives affect legume sanctions on rhizobia?
by: Ryoko Oono, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Mediating mutualisms: farm management practices and evolutionary changes in symbiont co-operation
by: Kiers, E, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Secretion systems and signal exchange between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and legumes
by: Matthew S Nelson, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)