Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen?
Why do rhizobia expend resources on fixing N(2) for the benefit of their host plant, when they could use those resources for their own reproduction? We present a series of theoretical models which counter the hypotheses that N(2) fixation is favoured because it (i) increases the exudation of useful...
Main Authors: | West, SA, Kiers, E, Simms, E, Denison, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2002
|
Similar Items
-
Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated?
by: West, SA, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.
by: Kiers, E, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Mediating mutualisms: farm management practices and evolutionary changes in symbiont co-operation
by: Kiers, E, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia
by: Geneviève Alloing, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
More Than a Functional Group: Diversity within the Legume–Rhizobia Mutualism and Its Relationship with Ecosystem Function
by: Benton N. Taylor, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)