Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.

Chromosome abnormalities are common among human oocytes and are usually lethal to any embryos they produce. It therefore seems logical that a reliable technique for distinguishing between normal and aneuploid embryos would be a useful tool for physicians and embryologists, assisting the choice of wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wells, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1826303703368335360
author Wells, D
author_facet Wells, D
author_sort Wells, D
collection OXFORD
description Chromosome abnormalities are common among human oocytes and are usually lethal to any embryos they produce. It therefore seems logical that a reliable technique for distinguishing between normal and aneuploid embryos would be a useful tool for physicians and embryologists, assisting the choice of which embryo(s) to prioritize for uterine transfer. This concept has led to the development of a variety of methods for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in oocytes and embryos, most often referred to as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). However, several well-controlled studies have been unable to show an advantage of chromosome screening in terms of pregnancy and birth rates. Some investigators have suggested that damage to embryos, sustained during cleavage-stage biopsy, might explain why PGS has not always provided the anticipated benefits. This paper asks whether there is evidence that a non-invasive, morphological analysis could allow chromosomally normal embryos to be accurately identified and reviews data from the most recent publication concerning IVF outcome following PGS.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:06:44Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ee1c78d6-d117-4885-918a-673080508b1f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:06:44Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ee1c78d6-d117-4885-918a-673080508b1f2022-03-27T11:30:12ZEmbryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ee1c78d6-d117-4885-918a-673080508b1fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Wells, DChromosome abnormalities are common among human oocytes and are usually lethal to any embryos they produce. It therefore seems logical that a reliable technique for distinguishing between normal and aneuploid embryos would be a useful tool for physicians and embryologists, assisting the choice of which embryo(s) to prioritize for uterine transfer. This concept has led to the development of a variety of methods for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in oocytes and embryos, most often referred to as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). However, several well-controlled studies have been unable to show an advantage of chromosome screening in terms of pregnancy and birth rates. Some investigators have suggested that damage to embryos, sustained during cleavage-stage biopsy, might explain why PGS has not always provided the anticipated benefits. This paper asks whether there is evidence that a non-invasive, morphological analysis could allow chromosomally normal embryos to be accurately identified and reviews data from the most recent publication concerning IVF outcome following PGS.
spellingShingle Wells, D
Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title_full Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title_fullStr Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title_full_unstemmed Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title_short Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.
title_sort embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening
work_keys_str_mv AT wellsd embryoaneuploidyandtheroleofmorphologicalandgeneticscreening