Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Most publications about selective reporting in clinical trials have focussed on outcomes. However, selective reporting of analyses for a given outcome may also affect the validity of findings. If analyses are selected on the basis of the results, reporting bias may occur. The aims of thi...
Main Authors: | Dwan, K, Altman, D, Clarke, M, Gamble, C, Higgins, J, Sterne, J, Williamson, P, Kirkham, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Similar Items
-
Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines.
by: Dwan, K, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines
by: Williamson Paula R, et al.
Published: (2008-11-01)