Comparing stereotests: the TNO test overestimates stereoacuity
Poster 2P034.
Main Authors: | Vancleef, K, Read, J, Herbert, W, Goodship, N, Woodhouse, M, Serrano-Pedraza, I |
---|---|
Format: | Conference item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis
by: Vancleef, K, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Two choices good, four choices better: for measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two
by: Vancleef, K, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Avoiding monocular artifacts in clinical stereotests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays
by: Serrano-Pedraza, I, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Stereotest comparison: efficacy, reliability, and variability of a new glasses-free stereotest
by: McCaslin, AG, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
by: Serrano-Pedraza, I, et al.
Published: (2020)