Comparing stereotests: the TNO test overestimates stereoacuity
Poster 2P034.
Autori principali: | Vancleef, K, Read, J, Herbert, W, Goodship, N, Woodhouse, M, Serrano-Pedraza, I |
---|---|
Natura: | Conference item |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Documenti analoghi
Documenti analoghi
-
Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis
di: Vancleef, K, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2017) -
Two choices good, four choices better: for measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two
di: Vancleef, K, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018) -
Avoiding monocular artifacts in clinical stereotests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays
di: Serrano-Pedraza, I, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2016) -
An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test
di: Portela-Camino JA, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021-07-01) -
Stereotest comparison: efficacy, reliability, and variability of a new glasses-free stereotest
di: McCaslin, AG, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)