Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit

Increasing numbers of people are surviving critical illness throughout the world, but survivorship is associated with long-term disability. In high-income settings physical rehabilitation is commonly employed to counter this and improve outcomes. These utilize highly-trained multidisciplinary teams...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Anh, NTK, Yen, LM, Nguyen, NT, Nhat, PTH, Thuy, TTD, Phong, NT, Tuyen, PT, Yen, NH, Chambers, M, Hao, NV, Rollinson, T, Denehy, L, Thwaites, CL
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Public Library of Science 2021
_version_ 1826303988785479680
author Anh, NTK
Yen, LM
Nguyen, NT
Nhat, PTH
Thuy, TTD
Phong, NT
Tuyen, PT
Yen, NH
Chambers, M
Hao, NV
Rollinson, T
Denehy, L
Thwaites, CL
author_facet Anh, NTK
Yen, LM
Nguyen, NT
Nhat, PTH
Thuy, TTD
Phong, NT
Tuyen, PT
Yen, NH
Chambers, M
Hao, NV
Rollinson, T
Denehy, L
Thwaites, CL
author_sort Anh, NTK
collection OXFORD
description Increasing numbers of people are surviving critical illness throughout the world, but survivorship is associated with long-term disability. In high-income settings physical rehabilitation is commonly employed to counter this and improve outcomes. These utilize highly-trained multidisciplinary teams and are unavailable and unaffordable in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). We aimed to design a sustainable intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation program and to evaluate its feasibility in a LMIC setting. In this project patients, care-givers and experts co-designed an innovative rehabilitation programme that can be delivered by non-expert ICU staff and family care-givers in a LMIC. We implemented this programme in adult patient with patients with tetanus at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City over a 5-month period, evaluating the programme's acceptability, enablers and barriers. A 6-phase programme was designed, supported by written and video material. The programme was piloted in total of 30 patients. Rehabilitation was commenced a median 14 (inter quartile range (IQR) 10-18) days after admission. Each patient received a median of 25.5 (IQR 22.8-34.8) rehabilitation sessions out of a median 27 (22.8-35) intended (prescribed) sessions. There were no associated adverse events. Patients and staff found rehabilitation to be beneficial, enhanced relationships between carers, patients and staff and was deemed to be a positive step towards recovery and return to work. The main barrier was staff time. The programme was feasible for patients with tetanus and viewed positively by staff and participants. Staff time was identified as the major barrier to ongoing implementation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:11:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ef7f0e6a-652a-4a27-9e85-feb3af24aa99
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:11:03Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ef7f0e6a-652a-4a27-9e85-feb3af24aa992022-03-27T11:40:44ZFeasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unitJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ef7f0e6a-652a-4a27-9e85-feb3af24aa99EnglishSymplectic ElementsPublic Library of Science2021Anh, NTKYen, LMNguyen, NTNhat, PTHThuy, TTDPhong, NTTuyen, PTYen, NHChambers, MHao, NVRollinson, TDenehy, LThwaites, CLIncreasing numbers of people are surviving critical illness throughout the world, but survivorship is associated with long-term disability. In high-income settings physical rehabilitation is commonly employed to counter this and improve outcomes. These utilize highly-trained multidisciplinary teams and are unavailable and unaffordable in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). We aimed to design a sustainable intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation program and to evaluate its feasibility in a LMIC setting. In this project patients, care-givers and experts co-designed an innovative rehabilitation programme that can be delivered by non-expert ICU staff and family care-givers in a LMIC. We implemented this programme in adult patient with patients with tetanus at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City over a 5-month period, evaluating the programme's acceptability, enablers and barriers. A 6-phase programme was designed, supported by written and video material. The programme was piloted in total of 30 patients. Rehabilitation was commenced a median 14 (inter quartile range (IQR) 10-18) days after admission. Each patient received a median of 25.5 (IQR 22.8-34.8) rehabilitation sessions out of a median 27 (22.8-35) intended (prescribed) sessions. There were no associated adverse events. Patients and staff found rehabilitation to be beneficial, enhanced relationships between carers, patients and staff and was deemed to be a positive step towards recovery and return to work. The main barrier was staff time. The programme was feasible for patients with tetanus and viewed positively by staff and participants. Staff time was identified as the major barrier to ongoing implementation.
spellingShingle Anh, NTK
Yen, LM
Nguyen, NT
Nhat, PTH
Thuy, TTD
Phong, NT
Tuyen, PT
Yen, NH
Chambers, M
Hao, NV
Rollinson, T
Denehy, L
Thwaites, CL
Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title_full Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title_fullStr Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title_short Feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a Vietnamese intensive care unit
title_sort feasibility of establishing a rehabilitation programme in a vietnamese intensive care unit
work_keys_str_mv AT anhntk feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT yenlm feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT nguyennt feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT nhatpth feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT thuyttd feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT phongnt feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT tuyenpt feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT yennh feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT chambersm feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT haonv feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT rollinsont feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT denehyl feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit
AT thwaitescl feasibilityofestablishingarehabilitationprogrammeinavietnameseintensivecareunit