Economic evaluation plan of a RCT of hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures: the WHiTE5 trial

<p><strong>Aim</strong></p> <p>This paper describes the methods applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty among hip fracture patients in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation Five (WHiTE5) trial.</p> <p><strong>...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: Png, ME, Fernandez, MA, Achten, J, Parsons, N, McGibbon, A, Gould, J, Griffin, X, Costa, ML
Médium: Journal article
Jazyk:English
Vydáno: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020
Popis
Shrnutí:<p><strong>Aim</strong></p> <p>This paper describes the methods applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty among hip fracture patients in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation Five (WHiTE5) trial.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>A within-trial cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be conducted at four months postinjury from a health system (National Health Service and personal social services) perspective. Resource use pertaining to healthcare utilization (i.e. inpatient care, physiotherapy, social care, and home adaptations), and utility measures (quality-adjusted life years) will be collected at one and four months (primary outcome endpoint) postinjury; only treatment of complications will be captured at 12 months. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p> <p>The planned analysis strategy described here records our intent to conduct a within-trial CUA alongside the WHiTE5 trial.</p>