Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study

<p><strong>Background:</strong><br /> Hip fracture is common, affecting 20% of women and 10% of men during their lifetime. The trajectory of patients’ recovery as they transition from the acute hospital setting to their usual residence is poorly understood. Recently, the use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armitage, LC, Chi, Y, Santos, M, Lawson, BK, Areia, C, Velardo, C, Watkinson, PJ, Tarassenko, L, Costa, ML, Farmer, AJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2020
_version_ 1826304071296876544
author Armitage, LC
Chi, Y
Santos, M
Lawson, BK
Areia, C
Velardo, C
Watkinson, PJ
Tarassenko, L
Costa, ML
Farmer, AJ
author_facet Armitage, LC
Chi, Y
Santos, M
Lawson, BK
Areia, C
Velardo, C
Watkinson, PJ
Tarassenko, L
Costa, ML
Farmer, AJ
author_sort Armitage, LC
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background:</strong><br /> Hip fracture is common, affecting 20% of women and 10% of men during their lifetime. The trajectory of patients’ recovery as they transition from the acute hospital setting to their usual residence is poorly understood. Recently, the use of activity trackers to monitor physical activity during recovery has been investigated as a way to explore this trajectory.</p><br /> <p><strong>Methods:</strong><br /> This prospective observational cohort study followed patients from hospital to home as they recovered from a hip fracture. Participants were recruited from a single centre and provided with a 3-axis logging accelerometer worn as a pendant, for 16 weeks from recruitment. Participants received monthly follow-up visits which included questions about wearing the monitor. Monthly activity monitor data were also downloaded. Participant activity was estimated from the monitor data using the calibrated “Euclidean Norm Minus One” (ENMO) metric. Polynomial mixed-effects modelling was used to evaluate the difference between the weekly activity trends of 2 groups of participants: those with and without independent mobility at 16 weeks (defined by whether aids or personal assistance were required to mobilise).</p><br /> <p><strong>Results:</strong><br /> Twenty-nine participants from 125 eligible patients were recruited. Of these, 19 (66%) reported being aware of wearing the monitor at least some of the time. Fourteen (48%) participants withdrew before study completion. Data for thirteen (45%) participants were of sufficient quantity to be included in the activity modelling procedure. Of these, 8 reported independent mobility at 16 weeks post-surgery, and 5 did not. By week 7, the weekly predicted mean ENMO (ENMOW) values were significantly different between the two participant groups, demonstrating feasibility of the model’s ability to predict which patients will report independent mobility at 16 weeks.</p><br /> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong><br /> This is the first study to our knowledge to investigate acceptability and feasibility of a pendant-worn activity monitor in this patient cohort. Acceptability of wearing the monitor and feasibility of recruitment and retention of participants were limited. Future research into the use of activity monitors in this population should use minimally intrusive devices which are acceptable to this population.</p><br /> <p><strong>Study Registration:</strong> MoHIP is a sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) Study (ISRCTN 63982700).</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:12:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:efeb435a-42ea-4143-a789-da418a443ea1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:12:14Z
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:efeb435a-42ea-4143-a789-da418a443ea12022-03-27T11:43:49ZMonitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort studyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:efeb435a-42ea-4143-a789-da418a443ea1EnglishSymplectic ElementsBioMed Central2020Armitage, LCChi, YSantos, MLawson, BKAreia, CVelardo, CWatkinson, PJTarassenko, LCosta, MLFarmer, AJ<p><strong>Background:</strong><br /> Hip fracture is common, affecting 20% of women and 10% of men during their lifetime. The trajectory of patients’ recovery as they transition from the acute hospital setting to their usual residence is poorly understood. Recently, the use of activity trackers to monitor physical activity during recovery has been investigated as a way to explore this trajectory.</p><br /> <p><strong>Methods:</strong><br /> This prospective observational cohort study followed patients from hospital to home as they recovered from a hip fracture. Participants were recruited from a single centre and provided with a 3-axis logging accelerometer worn as a pendant, for 16 weeks from recruitment. Participants received monthly follow-up visits which included questions about wearing the monitor. Monthly activity monitor data were also downloaded. Participant activity was estimated from the monitor data using the calibrated “Euclidean Norm Minus One” (ENMO) metric. Polynomial mixed-effects modelling was used to evaluate the difference between the weekly activity trends of 2 groups of participants: those with and without independent mobility at 16 weeks (defined by whether aids or personal assistance were required to mobilise).</p><br /> <p><strong>Results:</strong><br /> Twenty-nine participants from 125 eligible patients were recruited. Of these, 19 (66%) reported being aware of wearing the monitor at least some of the time. Fourteen (48%) participants withdrew before study completion. Data for thirteen (45%) participants were of sufficient quantity to be included in the activity modelling procedure. Of these, 8 reported independent mobility at 16 weeks post-surgery, and 5 did not. By week 7, the weekly predicted mean ENMO (ENMOW) values were significantly different between the two participant groups, demonstrating feasibility of the model’s ability to predict which patients will report independent mobility at 16 weeks.</p><br /> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong><br /> This is the first study to our knowledge to investigate acceptability and feasibility of a pendant-worn activity monitor in this patient cohort. Acceptability of wearing the monitor and feasibility of recruitment and retention of participants were limited. Future research into the use of activity monitors in this population should use minimally intrusive devices which are acceptable to this population.</p><br /> <p><strong>Study Registration:</strong> MoHIP is a sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) Study (ISRCTN 63982700).</p>
spellingShingle Armitage, LC
Chi, Y
Santos, M
Lawson, BK
Areia, C
Velardo, C
Watkinson, PJ
Tarassenko, L
Costa, ML
Farmer, AJ
Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title_full Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title_fullStr Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title_short Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): A sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study
title_sort monitoring activity of hip injury patients mohip a sub study of the world hip trauma evaluation observational cohort study
work_keys_str_mv AT armitagelc monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT chiy monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT santosm monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT lawsonbk monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT areiac monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT velardoc monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT watkinsonpj monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT tarassenkol monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT costaml monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy
AT farmeraj monitoringactivityofhipinjurypatientsmohipasubstudyoftheworldhiptraumaevaluationobservationalcohortstudy