The right to life and the Jus ad Bellum: belligerent equality and the duty to prosecute acts of aggression
General Comment 36 of the Human Rights Committee, adopted in 2018, asserts that ‘States parties engaged in acts of aggression as defined in international law, resulting in deprivation of life, violate ipso facto article 6 of the Covenant.’ One question about this claim is whether it reduces incentiv...
Päätekijät: | Jackson, M, Akande, D |
---|---|
Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
Kieli: | English |
Julkaistu: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
Moral equality of soldiers in war: Necessity of separating jus ad bellum from jus in bello
Tekijä: Stanar Dragan
Julkaistu: (2016-01-01) -
Derogation and the scope of the jus cogens norm in the jus ad bellum
Tekijä: Johnston, K
Julkaistu: (2018) -
Soft Law in Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum: What Lessons for Business and Human Rights?
Tekijä: Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg
Julkaistu: (2020-01-01) -
In Defense of the “Conventional Account” of the Jus ad Bellum
Tekijä: Tess Bridgeman
Julkaistu: (2018-01-01) -
Environmental Ethics of War: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and the Natural Environment
Tekijä: Tamar Meisels
Julkaistu: (2023-12-01)