The right to life and the Jus ad Bellum: belligerent equality and the duty to prosecute acts of aggression
General Comment 36 of the Human Rights Committee, adopted in 2018, asserts that ‘States parties engaged in acts of aggression as defined in international law, resulting in deprivation of life, violate ipso facto article 6 of the Covenant.’ One question about this claim is whether it reduces incentiv...
Автори: | Jackson, M, Akande, D |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
Moral equality of soldiers in war: Necessity of separating jus ad bellum from jus in bello
за авторством: Stanar Dragan
Опубліковано: (2016-01-01) -
Derogation and the scope of the jus cogens norm in the jus ad bellum
за авторством: Johnston, K
Опубліковано: (2018) -
Soft Law in Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum: What Lessons for Business and Human Rights?
за авторством: Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg
Опубліковано: (2020-01-01) -
In Defense of the “Conventional Account” of the Jus ad Bellum
за авторством: Tess Bridgeman
Опубліковано: (2018-01-01) -
Environmental Ethics of War: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and the Natural Environment
за авторством: Tamar Meisels
Опубліковано: (2023-12-01)