The right to life and the Jus ad Bellum: belligerent equality and the duty to prosecute acts of aggression
General Comment 36 of the Human Rights Committee, adopted in 2018, asserts that ‘States parties engaged in acts of aggression as defined in international law, resulting in deprivation of life, violate ipso facto article 6 of the Covenant.’ One question about this claim is whether it reduces incentiv...
Những tác giả chính: | Jackson, M, Akande, D |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Journal article |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
Moral equality of soldiers in war: Necessity of separating jus ad bellum from jus in bello
Bằng: Stanar Dragan
Được phát hành: (2016-01-01) -
Derogation and the scope of the jus cogens norm in the jus ad bellum
Bằng: Johnston, K
Được phát hành: (2018) -
Soft Law in Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum: What Lessons for Business and Human Rights?
Bằng: Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg
Được phát hành: (2020-01-01) -
In Defense of the “Conventional Account” of the Jus ad Bellum
Bằng: Tess Bridgeman
Được phát hành: (2018-01-01) -
Environmental Ethics of War: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and the Natural Environment
Bằng: Tamar Meisels
Được phát hành: (2023-12-01)