Surrogate markers in HIV disease.

The use of surrogate markers in HIV disease is an attractive method of assessing the efficacy of new treatments more quickly than by using clinical end-points. The characteristics of an ideal surrogate marker and the theoretical dangers of extrapolating properties from one class of drug to another a...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
1. autor: Peto, T
Format: Journal article
Język:English
Wydane: 1996
_version_ 1826304173653622784
author Peto, T
author_facet Peto, T
author_sort Peto, T
collection OXFORD
description The use of surrogate markers in HIV disease is an attractive method of assessing the efficacy of new treatments more quickly than by using clinical end-points. The characteristics of an ideal surrogate marker and the theoretical dangers of extrapolating properties from one class of drug to another are described. These characteristics are compared with the use of the CD4 lymphocyte count, which so far has been the most widely studied. Results from 14 randomized controlled trials of nucleoside analogues are used to compare the comparative changes of CD4 counts with the differential rates of progression to AIDS and differences in survival. There was some correlation between CD4 count changes and development of AIDS, particularly in the short term trials. In contrast, there was little correlation between CD4 counts and overall survival. Comparative studies between clinical end-points and quantitative measures of plasma viraemia have not yet been completed. In conclusion, no surrogate marker has yet been shown to be useful in predicting the efficacy of anti-HIV treatment. Until surrogate markers are validated against the results from long term clinical trials, they should only be used to screen new drugs warranting further study rather than to draw conclusions on the clinical efficacy of new treatments.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:13:46Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f06a535e-a89e-4d5a-bcf2-e14a40ebaf6d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:13:46Z
publishDate 1996
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f06a535e-a89e-4d5a-bcf2-e14a40ebaf6d2022-03-27T11:47:40ZSurrogate markers in HIV disease.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f06a535e-a89e-4d5a-bcf2-e14a40ebaf6dEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1996Peto, TThe use of surrogate markers in HIV disease is an attractive method of assessing the efficacy of new treatments more quickly than by using clinical end-points. The characteristics of an ideal surrogate marker and the theoretical dangers of extrapolating properties from one class of drug to another are described. These characteristics are compared with the use of the CD4 lymphocyte count, which so far has been the most widely studied. Results from 14 randomized controlled trials of nucleoside analogues are used to compare the comparative changes of CD4 counts with the differential rates of progression to AIDS and differences in survival. There was some correlation between CD4 count changes and development of AIDS, particularly in the short term trials. In contrast, there was little correlation between CD4 counts and overall survival. Comparative studies between clinical end-points and quantitative measures of plasma viraemia have not yet been completed. In conclusion, no surrogate marker has yet been shown to be useful in predicting the efficacy of anti-HIV treatment. Until surrogate markers are validated against the results from long term clinical trials, they should only be used to screen new drugs warranting further study rather than to draw conclusions on the clinical efficacy of new treatments.
spellingShingle Peto, T
Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title_full Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title_fullStr Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title_full_unstemmed Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title_short Surrogate markers in HIV disease.
title_sort surrogate markers in hiv disease
work_keys_str_mv AT petot surrogatemarkersinhivdisease