Saving Private Wrongs

Arthur Ripstein’s Private Wrongs defends a non-consequentialist, Kantian, theory of tort law. The first part of this article provides an overview of the main claims of this theory. The second part advances three lines of critique.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steel, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2017
_version_ 1826309239219421184
author Steel, S
author_facet Steel, S
author_sort Steel, S
collection OXFORD
description Arthur Ripstein’s Private Wrongs defends a non-consequentialist, Kantian, theory of tort law. The first part of this article provides an overview of the main claims of this theory. The second part advances three lines of critique.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:31:09Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f0c35360-9c05-464c-9ac9-cb1de882041a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:31:09Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f0c35360-9c05-464c-9ac9-cb1de882041a2023-01-13T10:30:11ZSaving Private WrongsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f0c35360-9c05-464c-9ac9-cb1de882041aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2017Steel, SArthur Ripstein’s Private Wrongs defends a non-consequentialist, Kantian, theory of tort law. The first part of this article provides an overview of the main claims of this theory. The second part advances three lines of critique.
spellingShingle Steel, S
Saving Private Wrongs
title Saving Private Wrongs
title_full Saving Private Wrongs
title_fullStr Saving Private Wrongs
title_full_unstemmed Saving Private Wrongs
title_short Saving Private Wrongs
title_sort saving private wrongs
work_keys_str_mv AT steels savingprivatewrongs