Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public

<p>The paper assesses the impact of Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations for press regulation on ordinary members of the public. With reference to cases such as the treatment of the transgender primary school teacher Lucy Meadows by the Daily Mail, he argues that any future regulator will st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wragg, P
Format: Record
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
_version_ 1797103092805664768
author Wragg, P
author_facet Wragg, P
author_sort Wragg, P
collection OXFORD
description <p>The paper assesses the impact of Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations for press regulation on ordinary members of the public. With reference to cases such as the treatment of the transgender primary school teacher Lucy Meadows by the Daily Mail, he argues that any future regulator will struggle to achieve any meaningful change to the ‘cultural indifference to individual privacy and dignity’ shown by sections of the press, given Leveson’s failure to clearly define, yet insistence on preserving, press partisanship.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:15:10Z
format Record
id oxford-uuid:f0d4f098-fb00-4198-9eb4-800f9206294f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:15:10Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f0d4f098-fb00-4198-9eb4-800f9206294f2022-03-27T11:51:11ZLeveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public Recordhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:f0d4f098-fb00-4198-9eb4-800f9206294fSocio-legal studiesEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2013Wragg, P<p>The paper assesses the impact of Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations for press regulation on ordinary members of the public. With reference to cases such as the treatment of the transgender primary school teacher Lucy Meadows by the Daily Mail, he argues that any future regulator will struggle to achieve any meaningful change to the ‘cultural indifference to individual privacy and dignity’ shown by sections of the press, given Leveson’s failure to clearly define, yet insistence on preserving, press partisanship.</p>
spellingShingle Socio-legal studies
Wragg, P
Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title_full Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title_fullStr Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title_full_unstemmed Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title_short Leveson reforms, editorial freedom, and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
title_sort leveson reforms editorial freedom and press discussion of ordinary members of the public
topic Socio-legal studies
work_keys_str_mv AT wraggp levesonreformseditorialfreedomandpressdiscussionofordinarymembersofthepublic