Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection

Protecting children from terrorism and violent extremism is a vital and increasing facet of child protection. Controversial government policy identifies radicalisation, including non-violent belief, as an important driver of violent action. The courts are increasingly faced with radicalisation cases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, RE
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Jordan Publishing 2018
_version_ 1797103479080091648
author Taylor, RE
author_facet Taylor, RE
author_sort Taylor, RE
collection OXFORD
description Protecting children from terrorism and violent extremism is a vital and increasing facet of child protection. Controversial government policy identifies radicalisation, including non-violent belief, as an important driver of violent action. The courts are increasingly faced with radicalisation cases, including the question of whether belief can constitute harm. The courts should resist drawing on controversial counter-terrorism policy to define harm to children. The language of radicalisation and extremism is too vague, over-broad and unstable to define harm in this intrusive area of the law. Well-established conventional child protection principles are best able to accommodate this new 'facet of vulnerability' and to preserve the neutrality of the courts and their focus on the child.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:20:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f29f7a99-fd43-4246-bbd0-c7c4672359b1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:20:43Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Jordan Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f29f7a99-fd43-4246-bbd0-c7c4672359b12022-03-27T12:05:15ZReligion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protectionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f29f7a99-fd43-4246-bbd0-c7c4672359b1EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordJordan Publishing2018Taylor, REProtecting children from terrorism and violent extremism is a vital and increasing facet of child protection. Controversial government policy identifies radicalisation, including non-violent belief, as an important driver of violent action. The courts are increasingly faced with radicalisation cases, including the question of whether belief can constitute harm. The courts should resist drawing on controversial counter-terrorism policy to define harm to children. The language of radicalisation and extremism is too vague, over-broad and unstable to define harm in this intrusive area of the law. Well-established conventional child protection principles are best able to accommodate this new 'facet of vulnerability' and to preserve the neutrality of the courts and their focus on the child.
spellingShingle Taylor, RE
Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title_full Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title_fullStr Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title_full_unstemmed Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title_short Religion as harm: Radicalisation, extremism and child protection
title_sort religion as harm radicalisation extremism and child protection
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorre religionasharmradicalisationextremismandchildprotection