Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research

Purpose Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) revealed indeterminate or conflicting study results. We aimed to systematically evaluate between-trial heterogeneity in reporting standards and trial outcome. Methods A systematic review of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juschten, J, Tuinman, PR, Guo, T, Juffermans, NP, Schultz, MJ, Loer, SA, Girbes, ARJ, de Grooth, HJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021
_version_ 1797103501393788928
author Juschten, J
Tuinman, PR
Guo, T
Juffermans, NP
Schultz, MJ
Loer, SA
Girbes, ARJ
de Grooth, HJ
author_facet Juschten, J
Tuinman, PR
Guo, T
Juffermans, NP
Schultz, MJ
Loer, SA
Girbes, ARJ
de Grooth, HJ
author_sort Juschten, J
collection OXFORD
description Purpose Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) revealed indeterminate or conflicting study results. We aimed to systematically evaluate between-trial heterogeneity in reporting standards and trial outcome. Methods A systematic review of RCTs published between 2000 and 2019 was performed including adult ARDS patients receiving lung-protective ventilation. A random-effects meta-regression model was applied to quantify heterogeneity (non-random variability) and to evaluate trial and patient characteristics as sources of heterogeneity. Results In total, 67 RCTs were included. The 28-day control-group mortality rate ranged from 10 to 67% with large non-random heterogeneity (I2 = 88%, p < 0.0001). Reported baseline patient characteristics explained some of the outcome heterogeneity, but only six trials (9%) reported all four independently predictive variables (mean age, mean lung injury score, mean plateau pressure and mean arterial pH). The 28-day control group mortality adjusted for patient characteristics (i.e. the residual heterogeneity) ranged from 18 to 45%. Trials with significant benefit in the primary outcome reported a higher control group mortality than trials with an indeterminate outcome or harm (mean 28-day control group mortality: 44% vs. 28%; p = 0.001). Conclusion Among ARDS RCTs in the lung-protective ventilation era, there was large variability in the description of baseline characteristics and significant unexplainable heterogeneity in 28-day control group mortality. These findings signify problems with the generalizability of ARDS research and underline the urgent need for standardized reporting of trial and baseline characteristics.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:20:57Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f2b39168-6b60-432e-8a21-5ce3b3ad438a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:20:57Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f2b39168-6b60-432e-8a21-5ce3b3ad438a2022-03-27T12:05:56ZBetween-trial heterogeneity in ARDS researchJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f2b39168-6b60-432e-8a21-5ce3b3ad438aEnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer2021Juschten, JTuinman, PRGuo, TJuffermans, NPSchultz, MJLoer, SAGirbes, ARJde Grooth, HJPurpose Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) revealed indeterminate or conflicting study results. We aimed to systematically evaluate between-trial heterogeneity in reporting standards and trial outcome. Methods A systematic review of RCTs published between 2000 and 2019 was performed including adult ARDS patients receiving lung-protective ventilation. A random-effects meta-regression model was applied to quantify heterogeneity (non-random variability) and to evaluate trial and patient characteristics as sources of heterogeneity. Results In total, 67 RCTs were included. The 28-day control-group mortality rate ranged from 10 to 67% with large non-random heterogeneity (I2 = 88%, p < 0.0001). Reported baseline patient characteristics explained some of the outcome heterogeneity, but only six trials (9%) reported all four independently predictive variables (mean age, mean lung injury score, mean plateau pressure and mean arterial pH). The 28-day control group mortality adjusted for patient characteristics (i.e. the residual heterogeneity) ranged from 18 to 45%. Trials with significant benefit in the primary outcome reported a higher control group mortality than trials with an indeterminate outcome or harm (mean 28-day control group mortality: 44% vs. 28%; p = 0.001). Conclusion Among ARDS RCTs in the lung-protective ventilation era, there was large variability in the description of baseline characteristics and significant unexplainable heterogeneity in 28-day control group mortality. These findings signify problems with the generalizability of ARDS research and underline the urgent need for standardized reporting of trial and baseline characteristics.
spellingShingle Juschten, J
Tuinman, PR
Guo, T
Juffermans, NP
Schultz, MJ
Loer, SA
Girbes, ARJ
de Grooth, HJ
Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title_full Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title_fullStr Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title_full_unstemmed Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title_short Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
title_sort between trial heterogeneity in ards research
work_keys_str_mv AT juschtenj betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT tuinmanpr betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT guot betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT juffermansnp betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT schultzmj betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT loersa betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT girbesarj betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch
AT degroothhj betweentrialheterogeneityinardsresearch